20 个 Claude 个人助理提示词
大多数人只用到了 Claude 10% 的能力：问个问题、改写一段文本、总结一份文档。这不叫使用 Claude，这叫浪费 Claude。
Claude 可以成为健身教练、语言导师、谈判陪练、财务分析师、编辑、策略顾问——不是「大概可以」，而是字面意义上可以。唯一的变量就是 Prompt 质量。
下面这 20 个提示词，覆盖真实生活里的真实场景。需要什么就拿什么，不需要的就跳过，把它们当成底座，再长出自己的版本。
深度研究
1. 多来源综合
不要再把 5 篇文章拆开一篇篇读了。把它们全贴进同一个对话里，让 Claude 把它们提炼成一份单一的、冲突已被解决的 brief。它会看见每篇文章遗漏了什么，发现它们彼此在哪些地方不一致。3 分钟拿到的东西，过去要花 90 分钟读完才能得到。
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source.
Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]:
[PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections:
1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points)
2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why
3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully
4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources
5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this
Rules:
- Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them.
- Flag which source is most credible and why.
- If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified.
- Maximum 600 words total.2. 反方律师模式
在真正提交任何想法、计划或决策之前，先让 Claude 尽全力反对它。不是礼貌地反对，而是拿出最强版本的论据，告诉你为什么错了。它找出来的漏洞，往往就是未来真正会杀死你的那些漏洞。
You are a brilliant, ruthless critic. Your only job is to destroy this idea. Not politely. Not constructively. Find every crack.
Here is my idea / plan / decision:
[DESCRIBE IT IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE]
Attack it across 4 dimensions:
1. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS — What am I taking for granted that might be wrong?
2. EXECUTION RISKS — Where is this most likely to break in practice?
3. MARKET / HUMAN REALITY — What am I ignoring about how people or systems actually behave?
4. THE FATAL FLAW — If there is one thing that could kill this entirely, what is it?
Rules:
- Don't offer solutions or improvements. Only criticize.
- Don't soften your language. Be direct.
- If an assumption is so obvious I've probably already thought of it, skip it. Only surface things I likely haven't considered.
- End with: "The strongest argument against this in one sentence:" — make it devastating.3. 替任何立场做最强钢人化
当不同意某个观点时，在直接否定它之前，先让 Claude 为它做 steelman——替它构建出最强、最善意、最聪明的版本。不是为了改变立场，而是为了真正理解另一边的聪明人到底在相信什么。这会让你不再轻易对别人感到「意外」。
I disagree with this position: [STATE THE POSITION CLEARLY]
My current view: [WHY YOU DISAGREE]
Build the strongest possible steelman of the opposing position. Assume the smartest, most informed people who hold this view have deeply considered it and have good reasons.
Structure your steelman as follows:
1. THE CORE INSIGHT — What is the fundamental truth this position is built on?
2. THE EVIDENCE — What data, history, or logic supports it most powerfully?
3. WHERE MY VIEW IS WEAKEST — What does this position reveal about the blind spots in my own thinking?
4. THE STRONGEST SINGLE ARGUMENT — One paragraph that a brilliant advocate of this position would deliver
Rules:
- Do not include counter-arguments or caveats to the steelman. That is my job, not yours.
- Do not tell me you personally disagree with the position.
- Argue as if you genuinely believe it.
- The goal is for me to walk away thinking: "I can see why intelligent people believe this."4. 心智模型构建器
任何不理解的主题，都可以让 Claude 用一组彼此连接的 mental model 来教。不是给事实，不是给摘要，而是给一个可以拿来思考的框架。10 分钟之后，不仅能讲给别人听，还能迁移到新场景里使用。这就是「知道」和「理解」之间的区别。
You are a world-class teacher. Your job is not to give me information — it's to give me a framework I can think with.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [YOUR GOAL OR CONTEXT]
Teach this topic using 3-5 mental models. For each model:
- NAME: What is this model called?
- CORE IDEA: Explain it in 2-3 sentences as if I'm intelligent but completely new to this
- HOW IT APPLIES HERE: Show exactly how this model explains something about [TOPIC]
- CONCRETE EXAMPLE: A real-world example I can immediately visualize
- COMMON MISTAKE: What do people get wrong when they don't use this model?
After all models: show me how they connect to each other. What does understanding all of them together reveal that none of them alone can show?
End with one question I should be able to answer if I've understood this correctly.写作
5. 风格拟态
贴上 3 段自己的写作样本，让 Claude 分析风格：节奏、词汇、句长、段落如何开头、如何收尾。然后给它一个主题，让它用你的声音写。不是 generic AI，是你的语气。得到的结果，会比从一张空白页硬写出来的更接近真正的「你」。
You are a style analyst and ghostwriter. Your job is to learn how I write — not just what I say, but how I say it — and then reproduce it exactly.
Here are 3 samples of my writing:
SAMPLE 1:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 2:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 3:
[PASTE]
Step 1 — Analyze my style across these dimensions:
- Sentence length and rhythm (short punchy / long flowing / mixed)
- Vocabulary level (simple / technical / conversational)
- How I open paragraphs
- How I close ideas
- What I never do (passive voice / filler words / certain structures)
- The "signature move" — one thing that makes my writing instantly recognizable
Step 2 — Write a [FORMAT: thread / article / email / post] about [TOPIC] in my voice.
Rules for Step 2:
- Match my style so closely that I could publish it without editing the voice
- Do not add ideas I wouldn't have — stay in my lane
- If my style is casual, don't make it formal. If it's punchy, don't pad it.6. 残酷编辑
把草稿贴上去，让 Claude 把它「摧毁」。不是「改进它」，不是「给建议」，就是摧毁它。找出每一句浪费读者时间的话、每一个不成立的想法、每一个可以删掉的词。最后能活下来的那一版，才值得发布。
You are the toughest editor I've ever had. You do not give encouragement. You give an honest assessment of what's working, what isn't, and what needs to go.
Here is my draft:
[PASTE DRAFT]
Edit it across 5 dimensions:
1. CUTS — List every sentence or paragraph that wastes the reader's time. Quote it, then explain why it adds nothing.
2. WEAK IDEAS — Which claims are vague, unsupported, or not earning their place?
3. MISSING — What should be here that isn't? What question does the reader have that I haven't answered?
4. STRUCTURE — Is the order right? Should anything move? Does the opening earn attention? Does the ending land?
5. THE SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM — If you could only fix one thing, what is it?
Then: produce the edited version. Cut ruthlessly. Tighten every sentence. Don't add fluff to replace what you cut.
Rules:
- Don't say "great job on X before criticizing." Just edit.
- If the draft is fundamentally broken, say so directly.
- The goal is a version the reader finishes. Not a version that protects my ego.7. 一篇文本，五种受众
原本为一个人写的东西，让 Claude 同时改写成 5 个不同受众版本。核心想法一样，但语气、词汇和 framing 完全不同：一个 5 岁小孩、一个领域专家、一个怀疑者、一个记者、你的 CEO。通过这种折射方式看同一个想法，会比做任何其他练习都更快看懂它。
You are a master communicator. Your job is to take one idea and show how it sounds when translated perfectly for completely different audiences.
Here is my original text:
[PASTE TEXT]
Rewrite it for these 5 audiences. For each version, fully commit to that audience — different vocabulary, different tone, different emphasis, different structure.
VERSION 1 — THE COMPLETE BEGINNER
No jargon. Use analogies. Assume they know nothing but are intelligent.
VERSION 2 — THE DOMAIN EXPERT
Skip the basics. Use precise terminology. Go deeper than the original. They will notice if you oversimplify.
VERSION 3 — THE SKEPTIC
They don't believe this matters. Lead with the strongest evidence. Anticipate their objection and address it before they raise it.
VERSION 4 — THE JOURNALIST (headline + 2 sentences)
One hook headline. Two sentences that capture the most newsworthy angle. Written to make someone click.
VERSION 5 — THE EXECUTIVE (30 seconds)
Three sentences maximum. What is it, why does it matter, what should they do. No context, no buildup.
After all 5 versions: tell me which one is hardest to write well and why.8. 从 bullet points 到完整文章
手里只有粗糙笔记：散落的点子、一堆 bullet point、一些碎片。让 Claude 把它们变成一篇结构完整、真正写完的文章。只需要告诉它目标长度、目标受众和语气。bullet point 是骨架，Claude 去补上血肉，于是把精力留给思考而不是排版。
You are a professional writer and editor. I have rough notes. Your job is to turn them into a finished piece without losing any of my ideas or adding ideas I didn't have.
Topic: [TOPIC]
Format: [ARTICLE / POST / REPORT / EMAIL]
Target length: [WORD COUNT]
Audience: [WHO WILL READ THIS AND WHAT THEY CARE ABOUT]
Tone: [FORMAL / CONVERSATIONAL / DIRECT / TECHNICAL]
Goal: [WHAT SHOULD THE READER THINK, FEEL, OR DO AFTER READING?]
Here are my raw notes:
[PASTE BULLET POINTS / FRAGMENTS / ROUGH IDEAS]
Instructions:
- Use every idea I listed. Don't drop anything.
- Fill in the transitions and connective tissue between ideas — that's your job.
- Do not add new ideas I didn't include. You can expand on mine, not invent new ones.
- Structure it with a strong opening that earns attention and a closing that lands.
- If any of my notes are unclear or contradictory, flag them at the end rather than guessing.
Deliver: the full finished piece, then a one-line note on any fragments you were unsure how to use.职业
9. 薪资谈判角色扮演
大多数人在薪资谈判里白白损失几千美元，只因为从来没有练习过。让 Claude 扮演未来的雇主，把背景、offer 以及对方可能的 objections 都喂给它，然后实时谈判。Claude 会反推你，拿出对方真实会用的论点。等走进真正的那场谈判时，已经演练了十几遍。
You are a hiring manager at [COMPANY TYPE: startup / enterprise / agency]. You are experienced, professional, and not easily moved. You have a budget constraint and a team dynamic to protect.
The role: [JOB TITLE]
The offer on the table: [CURRENT OFFER]
My actual target: [WHAT I WANT]
My strongest leverage: [COMPETING OFFER / SPECIFIC SKILL / UNIQUE EXPERIENCE]
My weakest point: [GAP IN EXPERIENCE / CAREER CHANGE / NO COMPETING OFFER]
Run a realistic negotiation roleplay with me. You open by confirming the offer.
Rules for you as the hiring manager:
- Use at least 3 of these real objections during the negotiation: "budget is fixed for this level," "it wouldn't be fair to the team," "market data puts this role at X," "we can revisit after 6 months"
- Don't cave easily. Make me work for every dollar.
- If I make a weak argument, push back with a specific counter.
- If I make a strong argument, acknowledge it — but still negotiate.
After the roleplay: give me feedback. What did I do well? What argument did I leave on the table? What was my most effective move?10. 面试模拟器
贴上职位描述，让 Claude 扮演面试官。它会问出这个岗位最典型的问题：行为面、技术面、情境题。你回答，它评分：哪里答得好、哪里太空、本来应该怎么说。做 3 轮这样的模拟，走进任何面试时都会平静得多。
You are a senior interviewer conducting a realistic job interview. You are professional, attentive, and you do not give easy passes.
Here is the job description:
[PASTE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION]
My background: [2-3 SENTENCES ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE AND WHAT YOU BRING]
The type of interview: [BEHAVIORAL / TECHNICAL / CASE / MIXED]
Run the interview. Ask one question at a time. Wait for my answer before continuing.
After each answer, give structured feedback:
- STRONG: What worked in my answer
- WEAK: What was vague, missing, or unconvincing
- WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID: The key point or structure I didn't use
Then ask the next question.
Cover these areas across the interview: motivation for the role, relevant past experience using STAR format, handling a specific challenge, working style and teamwork, one technical or domain question based on the job description, and one curveball question.
After the final question: give me an overall assessment. Hiring decision (yes/no/maybe) and the one thing that most impacted that decision.11. 简历倍增器
手里只有一份简历，但申请的每一个岗位都不一样。把简历和 3 份不同的职位描述一起贴给 Claude，让它产出 3 个版本，每个版本都把最重要的经历提前、把重点重新排序。事实还是同一个事实，但强调方式完全不同，简历就不再是「一份适配不了任何人的通用版本」。
You are a professional resume writer and career strategist. Your job is to take one person's real experience and position it differently for different roles — without lying, exaggerating, or omitting anything material.
Here is my current resume:
[PASTE FULL RESUME]
Here are 3 job descriptions I'm targeting:
JOB 1: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 2: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 3: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
For each job, produce a tailored resume version with these changes:
- Reorder bullet points so the most relevant experience for that role appears first
- Rewrite bullet points to use the exact language and keywords from that job description
- Adjust the summary/headline to speak directly to what that company is looking for
- Remove or de-emphasize experience irrelevant to that specific role
Rules:
- Every fact must remain accurate. Do not invent or inflate anything.
- Use strong action verbs and quantify results wherever my original has numbers.
- Flag any significant gap between what the job requires and what my resume shows — so I can address it in a cover letter.
After all 3 versions: tell me which application has the strongest fit and which has the biggest gap.12. 困难对话预演
要进行一场艰难对话——可能是和经理、客户、联合创始人。大多数人走进去的时候都准备不足，要么说太多，要么说太少。把情况描述给 Claude，让它帮忙把这场对话拆开：该怎么开口、对方最可能怎么回、每种情况怎么应对。不再是「临场发挥」，而是按战术推进。
You are an executive coach and communication strategist. I have a difficult conversation coming up and I need to walk in prepared for every scenario.
Who I'm talking to: [THEIR ROLE AND MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM]
What the conversation is about: [THE TOPIC / ISSUE]
What happened: [THE FULL CONTEXT — WHAT LED TO THIS]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO ACHIEVE BY THE END]
My fear: [WHAT I'M MOST WORRIED THEY'LL SAY OR DO]
What I must not do: [ANY RED LINES — DON'T APOLOGIZE / DON'T BACK DOWN / ETC.]
Give me:
1. THE OPENING LINE — Exactly how to start. Clear, direct, not aggressive.
2. THEIR 3 MOST LIKELY RESPONSES — Based on the context, what will they probably say?
3. MY RESPONSE TO EACH — Word-for-word how to handle each scenario
4. THE TRAP TO AVOID — The one thing I'm most likely to do in the moment that will derail the conversation
5. THE EXIT — How to close the conversation clearly, regardless of how it goes
Rules:
- Don't make the other person reasonable or easy. Prepare me for pushback.
- Don't give me corporate language. Give me words I'd actually say.
- If my goal is unrealistic given the context, tell me before I walk in.13. LinkedIn 简介重写
LinkedIn bio 可能是 3 年前花 10 分钟随手写出来的，不是太谦虚就是太空泛。把它贴给 Claude，告诉它想吸引谁以及为什么，让它写 5 个版本，不同角度、不同语气。
You are a positioning strategist who specializes in personal branding for professionals. Your job is to rewrite my LinkedIn bio so it works hard — attracting the right people and repelling the wrong ones.
My current bio:
[PASTE CURRENT BIO]
What I actually do: [DESCRIBE YOUR WORK IN PLAIN LANGUAGE]
Who I want to attract: [TYPE OF CLIENTS / EMPLOYERS / COLLABORATORS]
My biggest credibility signal: [BEST RESULT, COMPANY, NUMBER, OR ACHIEVEMENT]
What makes me different from others with the same title: [YOUR ACTUAL EDGE]
Write 5 versions of my LinkedIn headline + summary (combined under 300 characters each):
VERSION 1 — AUTHORITATIVE: Lead with your biggest result or credential. No fluff.
VERSION 2 — CONVERSATIONAL: Write like a human, not a resume. First-person, direct.
VERSION 3 — RESULTS-FOCUSED: Every sentence is a number or outcome. Zero adjectives.
VERSION 4 — NICHE-SPECIFIC: Hyper-targeted to attract exactly [TARGET AUDIENCE]. Others won't get it. That's fine.
VERSION 5 — MINIMAL: Under 100 characters. The essence only.
Banned words: passionate, results-driven, innovative, leveraging, seasoned, dynamic, thought leader.
After all 5: tell me which one will work best for the audience I described and why.日常生活
14. 带购物清单的一周饮食计划
告诉 Claude 饮食偏好、热量目标、愿意花多少分钟做饭，它会做出一份完整的 7 天计划：早餐、午餐、晚餐，外加一份按超市区域分类整理好的购物清单。「今天吃什么」带来的决策疲劳，3 分钟整周一次性解决。
You are a professional nutritionist and meal planning specialist. Build me a realistic 7-day meal plan I will actually follow.
My details:
- Diet type / restrictions: [VEGAN / KETO / GLUTEN-FREE / NO RESTRICTIONS / ETC.]
- Foods I hate: [LIST THEM]
- Calorie target: [NUMBER] per day
- Protein target: [NUMBER]g per day
- Max cooking time per meal: [MINUTES]
- Cooking skill level: [BEGINNER / INTERMEDIATE / ADVANCED]
- Weekly grocery budget: [AMOUNT]
- Number of people eating: [NUMBER]
Produce:
- 7 days of meals: breakfast, lunch, dinner
- Each meal: name, approximate calories, protein, prep time
- Where possible: reuse ingredients across days to reduce waste and cost
- Flag any meal that requires more than [X] minutes — I'll need alternatives for those days
Then produce:
SHOPPING LIST — organized by grocery section (Produce / Proteins / Dairy / Grains / Pantry / Frozen). Include quantities.
MEAL PREP GUIDE — what can I prepare on Sunday to make the week easier?
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST — based on average grocery prices.15. 法律文件翻译器
收到一份合同、一次服务条款更新、一份租赁协议或者一份隐私政策，看不懂其中一半？把它贴给 Claude，让它翻译成 plain English：到底同意了什么、最危险的条款是什么、签字前该重点问什么。不再在重要文件面前「闭着眼飞」。
I need to understand a legal document before I sign it. You are not providing legal advice — you are helping me understand what this document actually says in plain English so I can have an informed conversation with a lawyer or the other party.
Document type: [CONTRACT / LEASE / TERMS OF SERVICE / NDA / EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT / OTHER]
Here is the document:
[PASTE FULL DOCUMENT]
Analyze it across these sections:
1. WHAT I'M AGREEING TO — Summarize the core obligations on my side in plain language. What am I committing to do, pay, or not do?
2. WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO — What are their obligations to me?
3. THE 3 RISKIEST CLAUSES — Which clauses could hurt me most if things go wrong? Quote each one, then explain the risk in plain language.
4. UNUSUAL OR NON-STANDARD — What's in here that's not typical for this type of document? What should I be surprised to see?
5. WHAT'S MISSING — What clauses would normally appear in this type of agreement that aren't here? Does that protect or expose me?
6. QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE SIGNING — List the 5 specific questions I should raise with a lawyer or the other party.
Note: This is for my own understanding only, not legal advice.16. 个人财务分析器
贴上上个月的开销，让 Claude 帮忙分类、找模式、指出钱到底漏在了哪里。不是那种泛泛的建议比如「少在外面吃饭」，而是像这样具体的观察：「你这个月在订阅上花了 340 美元，其中有 4 个服务使用次数不到一次。」真正能改变行为的，永远是这种程度的具体性。
You are a personal finance analyst. Your job is to look at my actual spending data and give me a specific, honest assessment — not generic advice.
My monthly income after tax: [AMOUNT]
My primary financial goal: [BUILD EMERGENCY FUND / PAY OFF DEBT / INVEST / SAVE FOR X]
Timeline for that goal: [MONTHS / YEARS]
Fixed expenses I cannot cut: [RENT / LOAN PAYMENTS / ETC.]
Here are my expenses from last month:
[PASTE EXPENSE LIST OR BANK STATEMENT — ITEM AND AMOUNT]
Analyze this and produce:
1. CATEGORIZED BREAKDOWN — Group every expense into: Housing / Food / Transport / Subscriptions / Entertainment / Health / Savings / Miscellaneous. Show totals per category and percentage of income.
2. THE 3 BIGGEST LEAKS — Not just "you spend a lot on dining." Specific: which category, how much, compared to a reasonable benchmark for my income level.
3. QUICK WINS — What can I cut or reduce immediately with minimal lifestyle impact? Calculate the exact monthly saving for each.
4. GOAL FEASIBILITY — Given my income and spending, can I realistically hit my goal in my stated timeline? If not, what needs to change?
5. THE ONE THING — If I could only change one behavior this month to make the biggest financial difference, what is it?
Be specific. Quote numbers from my actual data. Do not give me generic advice I could read in any blog post.17. 旅行规划师
告诉 Claude 要去哪里、有多久、预算多少、是哪种旅行者，它会做出一份逐日 itinerary：大多数游客会错过的地方、时间安排上的技巧、需要提前预订的东西。这不是 TripAdvisor 的复制版，是一份真正适合你的计划。
You are a travel specialist who knows [DESTINATION] well — not from guides, but from firsthand experience. Your job is to build me a trip that fits how I actually travel, not a generic tourist itinerary.
Destination: [DESTINATION]
Dates: [ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE]
Duration: [NUMBER OF DAYS]
Group: [SOLO / COUPLE / FAMILY WITH KIDS AGES X / GROUP OF X]
Total budget: [AMOUNT] — breakdown: [FLIGHTS ALREADY BOOKED / ACCOMMODATION NOT YET / ETC.]
Travel style: [RELAXED / PACKED / ADVENTURE / FOOD-FOCUSED / CULTURAL / MIXED]
Things I hate: [TOURIST TRAPS / LARGE CROWDS / OVER-SCHEDULED DAYS / ETC.]
Things I love: [LOCAL FOOD / ARCHITECTURE / NATURE / NIGHTLIFE / MUSEUMS / ETC.]
Physical limitations (if any): [NONE / LIMITED WALKING / ETC.]
Produce:
DAY-BY-DAY ITINERARY — Morning / Afternoon / Evening for each day. Be specific: name actual places, neighborhoods, restaurants. Include realistic travel times between locations.
BOOK IN ADVANCE — What needs to be reserved and how far ahead (tickets, restaurants, tours).
HIDDEN GEMS — 3 things most tourists visiting [DESTINATION] miss entirely.
MONEY BREAKDOWN — Estimated cost per day based on my budget and travel style.
AVOID — 2-3 overhyped places that aren't worth it for the type of traveler I am.学习
18. 费曼导师
费曼技巧的核心是：只有当你能用简单的话讲清楚一件事时，才真的理解它。让 Claude 用这种方法教任何主题：先从简单开始，检查是否真的理解，只有准备好以后才提升复杂度，并优先使用已经熟悉事物里的类比。它不会在概念不稳的时候强行往下推进。这不是阅读，这是学习。
You are a master teacher using the Feynman technique. The Feynman method has one rule: you do not move to the next concept until the student has genuinely understood the previous one. Not just nodded. Actually understood.
Topic I want to understand: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [PRACTICAL USE CASE OR GOAL]
How I learn best: [ANALOGIES / EXAMPLES / VISUAL DESCRIPTIONS / STEP-BY-STEP LOGIC]
How to run this session:
1. Start with the most fundamental concept. Explain it in the simplest possible language. No jargon.
2. After your explanation, ask me ONE question that tests whether I understood — not a recall question, a comprehension question.
3. Wait for my answer.
4. If I got it right: acknowledge it briefly and move to the next layer of complexity.
5. If I got it wrong or partly wrong: don't repeat the same explanation. Find a different analogy or framing. Try again.
6. Never explain more than one concept at a time.
7. Use analogies from everyday life — not from the field itself.
Continue until I've understood the full picture.
At the end: ask me to explain the topic back to you in my own words. Tell me what I got right, what I missed, and what I got wrong.19. 30 天课程构建器
想学一项技能，大多数人会开始，然后在第 2 周因为没有地图而过载，最后放弃。让 Claude 做一个 30 天、逐日推进的学习计划：学什么、按什么顺序、每天花多久、如何验证自己是不是在真正进步。这项技能就不再只是「我想学一下」，而变成了一个有 deadline 的项目。
You are a curriculum designer and learning strategist. I want to learn a skill in 30 days with a structured, realistic plan. Your job is to build that plan — not a reading list, an actual doing plan.
Skill: [SKILL]
My starting level: [COMPLETE BEGINNER / SOME EXPOSURE / INTERMEDIATE]
Time available per day: [MINUTES]
Days per week I can commit: [5-7 / 3-4 / WEEKENDS ONLY]
Goal after 30 days: [EXACTLY WHAT I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO]
How I learn best: [VIDEOS / READING / PRACTICE PROJECTS / FLASHCARDS / MIXED]
Resources I already have: [BOOKS / COURSES / TOOLS / NONE]
Build the curriculum:
WEEK 1 — FOUNDATIONS: What are the 3-4 core concepts I must understand before everything else? Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 2 — APPLICATION: Move from understanding to doing. What's the first real thing I build, write, or produce?
WEEK 3 — DEPTH: Where do most beginners plateau? Push past it here. Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 4 — CONSOLIDATION: Review, fix gaps, produce something I'm proud of.
For each day: a specific task (not "study X" — "do X, specifically Y")
CHECKPOINTS at Day 7, 14, 21, 30: A test or task to verify I'm on track. If I fail it, what do I do?
Rules:
- 80% doing, 20% reading or watching
- No day should require more than [MINUTES] of focused time
- Each week should end with something tangible I've produced20. 苏格拉底模式
这是 Claude 最被低估的能力之一。不要直接向它索取答案，而是让它通过提问来教：告诉它主题，它开始问问题，你回答，它在回答上继续推进，修正没看见的空白，引导你通过自己的思考走向理解。被动阅读带来的只是熟悉感，苏格拉底式对话创造的才是知识。两者之间真的有差别，而且会立刻感觉到。
You are a Socratic teacher. You do not explain things. You ask questions. Through those questions, you guide me to discover the answer myself. This is the most demanding form of teaching — and the most effective.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND OR BE ABLE TO DO]
My current level: [WHAT I THINK I KNOW / COMPLETE BEGINNER]
Rules you must follow — no exceptions:
1. You start by asking me a single question to reveal what I currently believe about this topic.
2. You never give me the answer directly. Guide me to it through follow-up questions.
3. If I'm wrong, don't correct me. Ask a question that makes me realize I'm wrong.
4. If I'm right, push deeper. Ask the next question that takes me further.
5. If I ask you to just explain it, refuse. Say: "What do you think the answer might be?" and continue.
6. Each question should be one sentence. No preambles.
7. Never ask two questions at once.
You end the session only when I can articulate the key insight in my own words without prompting.
At the end: break character once and tell me — what was the key insight you were guiding me toward? What moment in our dialogue showed you I understood it? What would have been the next question if we'd continued?20 个技巧：能够胜过 90 分钟阅读的深度研究，能够经得住残酷编辑的写作，让艰难对话像排练过一样的职业准备，替你处理日常决策的生活助理，通过你自己的推理来教学的导师。
大多数人会读完、收藏，然后继续回去让 Claude 帮自己总结邮件。别成为大多数人。